The prank was elegant, damn near perfect, in its simplicity: Ashley Feinberg and Adam Pash put together a Twitter account, using the fascist dictator's nickname Il Duce, and festooned it with blatantly fascist imagery, including a picture of Mussolini himself, with his hair photoshopped in to look like Trump's. American voters haven't let a bald president into the White House since 1952.Over the weekend, Gawker successfully pranked Donald Trump by getting him to retweet a quote from Benito Mussolini. to weave or not to weave - this bit of journalism may still be even more crucial than we appreciate. Its color and texture and perhaps even its provenance have changed over the years, but it still manages to take up the same cultural space it has since the '80s: a touch of visible absurdity gracing a man who is, for the most part, terrifying.Īs to the $60,000 question - a.k.a. But his hair! Donald Trump's hair remains as ridiculous as ever. His entire, improbable campaign - to say nothing of whatever the next few months might hold - is too much to contemplate now. He's not America's next father figure, but our mistress.ĭoubtless, the study of Donald Trump's hair also has something to offer to his detractors. The surreally feminizing effect of his hairstyle resonates with this approach. Whatever rage you harbor, I'll double it. His approach to every crowd is I'll be whoever you want me to be. Trump's campaign, when it isn't about ranting and rhetorical violence, is all about the shimmy, the bump-and-grind, the not-so-subtle seduction. In that moment, Trump's hair seemed, more than anything, to be reminiscent of the cotton-candy halo that was Marilyn Monroe's. Lookit," he said, and smoothed his fluff of bangs away from his forehead in a gesture that seemed almost flirtatious. "And by the way," he added, "look: It really is mine. "My hair look OK?" he asked a whooping crowd in West Virginia after quickly trying on and then removing a mining helmet of the kind his constituents wore every day. In this case, however, the object of our obsession is not a man's head, but his hair.īack when he still had any competitors within his party, Trump was unique among GOP candidates for seeming not just to tolerate his body, but to delight in it. The tone we've adopted is eerily similar: They don't want you to know the truth, it says, but look closely and you'll find it. This kind of fervid attention to detail is reminiscent of the back-and-to-the-leftballistics theories surrounding the Kennedy assassination. "But that proves nothing: Hair transplants feel like real hair because they consist of real hair." "Trump often makes a great show of letting people touch his hair to prove it's not a toupee," baldness cure chronicler Gersh Kuntzman remarked in a takedown of the Gawker article. This May, a Gawker story that argued Trump's hair was " a $60,000 weave" inspired heated debate and drew the threat of lawsuit. It's a good time to be an investigative journalist with a background in toupees and weaves. Today, perhaps the only question more vexing than whether Donald Trump may actually win the presidency is what is the deal with that hair? Whatever you call it, you know what it looks like, and now more clearly than ever.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |